The myth of controlled cryingThe Myth of Controlled Crying
Despite the popularity of controlled crying it is not an evidence-based practice. Professor James McKenna, director of the Mother-Baby Behavioural Sleep Laboratory at the University of Notre Dame, Indiana and acclaimed SIDS expert describes controlled crying as ‘social ideology masquerading as science’. What this means is that despite many opinions on how long to leave a baby to cry, to train her to sleep, nobody has studied exactly how long it is safe to leave a baby to cry, if at all. Babies who are made to sleep alone (or cry, because many do not sleep) for hours may miss out on both adequate nutrition and sensory stimulation such as touch, which is vital for infant development. Leaving a baby to ‘cry it out’ to enforce a strict routine when the baby may, in fact be hungry, is similar to expecting an adult to adopt a strenuous exercise program accompanied by less food. Paediatrician William Sears has claimed, “Babies who are ‘trained’ not to express their needs may appear to be docile, compliant or ‘good’ babies. Yet these babies could be depressed babies who are shutting down the expression of their needs. “Babies can indeed have an actual diagnosis of clinical depression”. Often caused by trauma due to early hospitalisation and medical treatments it is also easy to understand how rigid regimes can cause depression. You too would withdraw and become sad if the people you loved avoided eye contact and ignored your cries, as some sleep techniques advise. Leaving a baby to cry evokes physiological responses that increase stress hormones, heart rate and temperature. These reactions can result in overheating and could pose a potential risk of SIDS in vulnerable infants. There may also be longer-term emotional effects. Babies need our help to learn to regulate their emotions, meaning that when we respond to and soothe their cries, we help them understand that when they are upset they can calm down. There is also compelling evidence that increased levels of stress hormones may cause permanent changes in the stress responses of an infant’s developing brain. These changes can affect memory and emotion and trigger an elevated response to stress throughout life, including a tendency to anxiety and depressive disorders. English psychotherapist Sue Gerhardt, author of Why Love Matters: How Affection Shapes A Baby’s Brain explains that when a baby is upset the hypothalamus produces cortisol. In normal amounts cortisol is fine, but if a baby is exposed for too long or too often to stressful situations (such as being left to cry) its brain becomes flooded with cortisol and it will either over- or under-produce cortisol whenever the child is exposed to stress. Too much cortisol is linked to depression and fearfulness; too little to emotional detachment and aggression. One of the arguments for controlled crying is that it ‘works’, but perhaps the definition of success needs to be examined. In the small number of studies undertaken, while most babies will indeed stop waking when they are left to cry, ‘success’ varies from an extra hour’s sleep each night to little difference between babies who underwent sleep training and those who didn’t. Some studies found that up to one-third of babies who underwent controlled crying ‘failed sleep school’. To me this suggests that even if harsher regimes work initially, babies are likely to start waking again as they reach new developmental stages or conversely, they may become more settled and sleep (without any intervention) as they reach appropriate developmental levels.Controlled crying and other similar regimes may indeed work to produce a self-soothing, solitary sleeping infant. However, the trade-off could be an anxious, clingy or hyper-vigilant child or even worse, a child whose trust is broken. Unfortunately, we can’t measure attributes such as trust and empathy which are the basic skills for forming all relationships. We can’t, for instance, give a child a trust quotient like we can give him an intelligence quotient. One of the saddest emails I have received was from a mother who did controlled crying with her one-year-old toddler. “After a week of controlled crying he slept, but he stopped talking (he was saying single words). For the past year, he has refused all physical contact from me. If he hurts himself, he goes to his older brother (a preschooler) for comfort. I feel devastated that I have betrayed my child.” It is the very principle that makes controlled crying ‘work’ that is of greatest concern: when controlled crying ‘succeeds’ in teaching a baby to fall asleep alone, it is due to a process that neurobiologist Bruce Perry calls the ‘defeat response’. Normally, when humans feel threatened, our bodies flood with stress hormones and we go into ‘fight’ or ‘flight’. However, babies can’t fight and they can’t flee, so they communicate their distress by crying. When infant cries are ignored, this trauma elicits a ‘freeze’ or ‘defeat’ response. Babies eventually abandon their crying as the nervous system shuts down the emotional pain and the striving to reach out. One explanation for the success of ‘crying it out’ is that when an infant’s defeat response is triggered often enough, the child will become habituated to this. That is, each time the child is left to cry, he ‘switches’ more quickly to this response. This is why babies may cry for say, an hour the first night, twenty minutes the following night and fall asleep almost immediately on the third night (if you are ‘lucky’). They are ‘switching off’ (and sleeping) more quickly, not learning a legitimate skill. Whether sleep ‘success’ is due to behavioural principles (that is, a lack of ‘rewards’ when baby wakes) or whether the baby is overwhelmed by a stress reaction, the saddest risk of all is that as he tries to communicate in the only way available to him, the baby who is left to cry in order to teach him to sleep will learn a much crueler lesson – that he cannot make a difference, so what is the point of reaching out. This is learned helplessness. 30 CommentsFeedAdd Comment |
Search SiteSign up to our Free NewsletterLatest Comments
|
Wednesday, 25 November 2009
Wednesday, 25 November 2009
Thursday, 17 June 2010
Friday, 25 June 2010
My son has always been skinny and hungry - I breastfed him on demand for 7 months (3 times/night), then I went back to work. I continued to breastfeed evening, morning and twice per night, until the supply dried up at 12 months. We then bottlefed him once during the night until 2 years, when we switched from full formula to steadily watered-down formula to plain warm water, and then at 2 and a half, he was *finally* sleeping through the night!
Now my son is 10, still eats voraciously and is still skinny, but is very tall and very intelligent. If you interfere with the natural patterns of sleeping and eating, you risk stunting your child, emotionally, physically and intellectually.
Tuesday, 21 September 2010
Monday, 08 November 2010
Monday, 14 February 2011
Saturday, 19 February 2011
Sunday, 20 February 2011
Sunday, 27 February 2011
Any one who defends controlled crying only does so to avoid feeling guilty or because they are too selfish and emotionally distant to put the baby's needs above their own.
If more people co slept with their babies and toddlers, there wouldn't be the problem of them being unsettled at night because they would feel safe, content and loved.
Sunday, 13 March 2011
Friday, 18 March 2011
Tuesday, 31 May 2011
Tuesday, 31 May 2011
Thursday, 16 June 2011
Friday, 24 June 2011
Tuesday, 19 July 2011
Enough.
Discipline and Consistency will get your child to sleep. And teach them they are PART of the world, not the WORLD itself.
Tuesday, 26 July 2011
Everyone needs to listen to their insticts, and if the baby is given enough attention and learning through the day, there is NOTHING WRONG with being the parent when it comes to bed time. Children need to learn (from 6months onward) that Mummy and Daddy are in charge, and that is because they are the caregivers.
Monday, 01 August 2011
Saturday, 27 August 2011
Thursday, 22 September 2011
Tuesday, 27 September 2011
Tuesday, 08 November 2011
This topic is very close to my heart. People who advocate controlled crying are asking people to ignore their parental instincts and force their baby into a strict "routine". My wife and I take shifts through the night and we are always there for our baby no matter how tired we get ourselves. I would not ignore our baby for any reason. Babies are not manipulative control freaks. They are BABIES.
Tuesday, 08 November 2011
Sunday, 13 November 2011
Thursday, 01 December 2011
Wednesday, 21 December 2011
Sunday, 15 January 2012
Monday, 23 January 2012
First, Please check if there is something wrong with your baby first if you are choosing to do controlled crying. My son cried all through the night, and I discovered his back was out. After getting his back put back in, he slept fine. My daughter didn't sleep well because she had reflux, so sleeping her with the head-end of her cot slightly raised helped alot. And they always cried when they needed to burp, and couldn't burp until I picked them up. So please check out that your baby is 100% well before doing this!
Second, Its totally possible to teach your baby to sleep through without leaving them to cry. A book that helped me so much is 'the no-cry sleep solution' by Elizabeth Pantley. Please check out the alternatives, controlled crying is not necessary.
Tuesday, 24 January 2012